Why did Shell sue Greenpeace?
On 10 December, Shell UK and Greenpeace settled a legal dispute over costs incurred during Greenpeace’s dangerous and unlawful boarding of a vessel in the Atlantic Ocean in early 2023. Read our full statement here.
In January 2023, Greenpeace activists illegally boarded a 72,000 metric ton moving ship (the White Marlin) in the Atlantic Ocean carrying the newly built “Penguins” floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel. The activists did so in a manner which was both unlawful and dangerous, occupying the ship for 13 days.
Read the transcript
Read the transcript
Title: Shell and Greenpeace agree settlement over dangerous and unlawful boarding of vessel
Duration: 0:35 minutes
Description:
This video shows Greenpeace activists illegally boarding a 72,000 metric ton moving ship (the White Marlin) in the Atlantic Ocean carrying the newly built “Penguins” floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel. The activists did so in a manner which was both unlawful and dangerous, occupying the ship for 13 days.
Shell and Greenpeace agree settlement over dangerous and unlawful boarding of vessel - PL1 Transcript
Video footage
The video begins with drone and body camera footage of a Greenpeace activist trying to board a moving ship during a rough weather.
[Text displays]
January 2023:
Greenpeace protestors illegally boarded this vessel
As it was being transported
In the North Atlantic
Video footage
The drone footage of Greenpeace activist climbing “Penguins” floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel, followed by footage of crew of White Merlin.
[Text displays]
Their actions were dangerous
Putting their own lives at risk
And threatening the safety of others on board.
Video footage
The drone footage of Greenpeace activist in climbing equipment hanging on the side of the “Penguins” FPSO.
[Text displays]
Despite legal action to stop further unlawful actions
More protestors boarded.
They occupied vessel for 13 days.
Video footage
Video footage fades to black.
[Text displays]
Shell respects the fundamental right to protest
But we believe that it must be done safely and lawfully.
To prevent the protests from escalating, and in view of the ship’s route through the English Channel – one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes – Shell UK and its contractor obtained an injunction from the court. The High Court judge said Greenpeace protestors were “putting their lives and, indirectly, the lives of the crew at risk”. However, other Greenpeace protestors ignored this and boarded the vessel in a second protest, meaning we had to seek another injunction.
To obtain these injunctions, Shell UK filed a legal claim against Greenpeace. This claim sought reimbursement of the costs incurred by Shell UK, its contractors and sub-contractors to deal with Greenpeace’s actions and convert the injunctions into a permanent injunction.
On 10 December 2024, Greenpeace has agreed to give binding a legal commitment to Shell and the High Court that it would not carry out similar actions and make a payment to the Royal National Lifeboat Institution. This recognised Shell’s main concern with the Greenpeace action – that this kind of stunt at sea is a serious risk to safety and life. Read our full statement here
What did Shell’s legal claim cover?
Shell was seeking to recover from Greenpeace the direct costs it incurred as a result of the 2023 boarding, which amounted to USD $900,000 and not the USD $11 million figure Greenpeace uses in its communications. The costs included:
- approximately USD $500,000 incurred for the support vessel to provide emergency response in the event of a safety incident (including any involving the protestors) and to deter further attempted boardings.
- The cost of a guard vessel and additional security equipment at the arrival port to ensure safe arrival of the vessel and FPSO and disembarkation of the protestors.
- Payment by Shell to its contractors to cover their time spent dealing with the protest.
Shell was not seeking to recover any losses from individual protestors.
What does the settlement agreement cover?
A settlement payment of £300,000 – more than one third of the costs incurred during the unlawful boarding - will be paid to the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI), a charity working on safety at sea. As part of the settlement, Greenpeace has also signed a legally binding commitment to Shell UK and the High Court. It prohibits Greenpeace from carrying out similar actions at or near key oil and gas platforms in the North Sea for 5 to 10 years.
Is Shell trying to silence Greenpeace?
No. The right to protest is fundamental and Shell respects it absolutely, but it must be done safely and legally. In filing the claim in February 2023, Shell UK sought the court’s assistance to prevent an ongoing incident from escalating and to bring the protests to an end safely and peacefully. The protestors were offered the chance to disembark earlier, but chose not to.
In granting the injunctions, the judge was clear that Greenpeace could still protest from a safe distance and that their human rights were not infringed.
Why is Penguins needed? Doesn’t the UK have enough oil and gas already?
Households, motorists and businesses need a stable supply of oil and gas, which remain a key part of the UK energy mix. After decades of supplying oil and gas, output from the UK North Sea is tailing off and now meets less than 50% of the UK’s demand. It is important to stop it tailing off too steeply, while the transition to low-carbon energy gathers pace.
Locally produced, responsible oil and gas production is critical for UK energy security and entirely consistent with a net zero pathway as modelled by the UK’s independent climate advisors, the Climate Change Committee. Penguins is not a new field, but one which has already been producing oil and gas for 20 years. The new floating vessel which was boarded by the protestors will allow production from the Penguins field to continue to provide the necessary energy that the UK needs.
Cautionary note
Cautionary note
The companies in which Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate legal entities. In this presentation “Shell”, “Shell Group” and “Group” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These terms are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular entity or entities. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this presentation refer to entities over which Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. Entities and unincorporated arrangements over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to as “joint ventures” and “joint operations”, respectively. “Joint ventures” and “joint operations” are collectively referred to as “joint arrangements”. Entities over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control are referred to as “associates”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect ownership interest held by Shell in an entity or unincorporated joint arrangement, after exclusion of all third-party interest.
Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “aim”, “ambition”, ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, “milestones”, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, “schedule”, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this presentation, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, judicial, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; (m) risks associated with the impact of pandemics, such as the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak; and (n) changes in trading conditions. No assurance is provided that future dividend payments will match or exceed previous dividend payments. All forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Shell plc’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this presentation and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation, 10 December, 2024. Neither Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation.
Shell’s net carbon intensity
Also, in this presentation we may refer to Shell’s “Net Carbon Intensity”, which includes Shell’s carbon emissions from the production of our energy products, our suppliers’ carbon emissions in supplying energy for that production and our customers’ carbon emissions associated with their use of the energy products we sell. Shell only controls its own emissions. The use of the term Shell’s “Net Carbon Intensity” is for convenience only and not intended to suggest these emissions are those of Shell plc or its subsidiaries.
Shell’s net-Zero Emissions Target
Shell’s operating plan, outlook and budgets are forecasted for a ten-year period and are updated every year. They reflect the current economic environment and what we can reasonably expect to see over the next ten years. Accordingly, they reflect our Scope 1, Scope 2 and Net Carbon Intensity (NCI) targets over the next ten years. However, Shell’s operating plans cannot reflect our 2050 net-zero emissions target and 2035 NCI target, as these targets are currently outside our planning period. In the future, as society moves towards net-zero emissions, we expect Shell’s operating plans to reflect this movement. However, if society is not net zero in 2050, as of today, there would be significant risk that Shell may not meet this target.
Forward Looking Non-GAAP measures
This presentation may contain certain forward-looking non-GAAP measures such as cash capital expenditure and divestments. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of these forward-looking Non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures because certain information needed to reconcile those Non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures is dependent on future events some of which are outside the control of Shell, such as oil and gas prices, interest rates and exchange rates. Moreover, estimating such GAAP measures with the required precision necessary to provide a meaningful reconciliation is extremely difficult and could not be accomplished without unreasonable effort. Non-GAAP measures in respect of future periods which cannot be reconciled to the most comparable GAAP financial measure are calculated in a manner which is consistent with the accounting policies applied in Shell plc’s consolidated financial statements.
The contents of websites referred to in this presentation do not form part of this presentation.
We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this presentation that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov.